Split - Movie Trailers - i. This C# tutorial shows the string.Split method. It uses Split with arguments in example programs. The oldest and most detailed City of Split and Split Dalmatia County tourist guide in Croatia. Split, Croatia - how to arrive? The board split in two. The hull of the ship split apart on the rocks. A large chunk of ice split off from the iceberg and crashed into the water. Writer/director/producer M. Night Shyamalan returns to the captivating grip of The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable and Signs with Split, an original thriller that delves. Cara Melakukan sebuah Split. Pernahkah Anda benar-benar terkesan dengan kelenturan penari balet atau pesenam hebat sehingga Anda berpikir, 'Aku tidak akan bisa. AC Split inverter ac split deluxe ac split standard 1/2 pk - 1 pk - 1.5 pk - 2 pk - 3 pk. BERANDA; PROFIL; PRODUCT. Splitting means performing a non-automated procedure by which the contents of a page are split into two or more pages. There are two main reasons for splitting. Split Movie TrailerSynonyms for split at Thesaurus.com with free online thesaurus, antonyms, and definitions. Dictionary and Word of the Day. Split Airport (IATA: SPU, ICAO: LDSP; Croatian: Zra Live stream and record your content with ease & share it to streaming services like Twitch, UStream, Hitbox and YouTube. Start your broadcast today. Wikipedia: Splitting - Wikipedia. If an article becomes too large, or a section of an article has a length that is out of proportion to the rest of the article, it is often appropriate for some or all of the article to be split into new articles. In some cases, refactoring an article into child or sister articles can allow subtopics to be discussed more fully elsewhere without dominating a general overview article to which they are non- central (but only if the new articles are themselves sufficiently notable to be included in the encyclopedia). When to split. If either the whole article, or the specific material within one section becomes too large, or if the material is seen to be inappropriate for the article due to being out of scope, then a split may be considered or proposed. Consideration must be given to size, notability and potential neutrality issues before proposing or carrying out a split. Size split. A page of about 3. B) of readable prose, which roughly corresponds to 6,0. Also, some users may have technical limitations, such as a low speed service, an unstable connection, a pay per kilobyte service, or they may access Wikipedia through a mobile phone or smartphone, and these mobile browsers may truncate long pages. At 5. 0 k. B of readable prose and above it may benefit the reader to consider moving some sections to new articles and replace them with summaries per Wikipedia: Summary style. Consideration, however, needs to be given to the amount and quality of material to be moved. If the material for the new article is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of the subject, or would simply duplicate the summary that would be left behind, then it may be too soon to move it. Unsourced material shouldn't be used to create new articles as it may have notability or verifiability issues. Below 5. 0 k. B, an article may not need splitting based on size alone, and at 4. B and below a split would generally only be justified based on content issues. Rule of thumb: Readable prose size. What to do> 1. BAlmost certainly should be divided> 6. BProbably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading time)> 5. BMay need to be divided (likelihood goes up with size)< 4. BLength alone does not justify division< 1 k. BIf an article or list has remained this size for over a couple of months, consider combining it with a related page. Alternatively, why not fix it by adding more info? See Wikipedia: Stub. Please note: These guidelines apply somewhat less to disambiguation pages and naturally do not apply to redirects. They also apply less strongly to list articles, especially if splitting them would require breaking up a sortable table. Content split. Sometimes the distinct topics may be closely related, such as Coffea (the plant) and coffee (the product), or thermal energy and heat. When two or more distinct topics which share the same or similar title are being written about on the same page, even if they are closely related, a content split may be considered, and a disambiguation page created to point readers to the separate pages. Consideration must be given both to notability and to potential neutrality issues before proposing a split. If one or more of the topics is not notable it may be more appropriate to simply remove the material from Wikipedia than to create a new article. If unsure, then use a template, and start a discussion on the article talkpage. Procedure. If unsure, or with high profile or sensitive articles, start a . Additionally, adding one of the splitting templates will display a notice on the article and list it at Category: Articles to be split. This will help bring it to the attention of editors who may assist in establishing consensus, in deciding if a split is appropriate, or in carrying out the split. Templates used without an accompanying rationale, and where there is no obvious reason for the split request, may be removed at any time. Failure to reach a consensus, whether the result of a split discussion, or a bold split that was contested usually results in the article remaining whole. A contested bold split may be reverted, however it is not always appropriate to redirect the new article to the old as the new article may stand on its own even if the main article that it came from is not split. To conform with Wikipedia's licensing requirements, which require that content contributors receive attribution, the page receiving the split material must have an edit summary noting . It is a requirement of Wikipedia's licensing that attribution be given to the main content author(s). For further information, refer to the main Copying within Wikipedia guideline. If material is split from an article, consider if a summary section should be created, and if a . In general, if the split is due to size, then a summary section is required, if the split is due to content (or scope), then a summary section is unlikely to be required. How to properly split an article. These instructions are provided for guidance, but some steps may not be necessary in all cases and these instructions may not cover every eventuality. It is advisable to read the through the whole of this procedure before starting. Prepare the source article by grouping the material to be split out into a single section. Create the new article by opening the empty page (or redirect page). Open the source article (or relevant section) to edit in another browser window (or tab) and copy the contents to be split out (from the section created in step #1) from the source article. Paste into the new article with edit summary . There may also be sections of a bibliography, navboxes, See also section or External links that can be copied from the source article. Adjust section headings. Add any background information about the parent subject that will be necessary for the reader to understand the subtopic. Resolve any cite errors that occur when invocations of a named reference are separated from their definition - i. Note: it may be best to prepare this in advance as summarising several pages of text and selecting a single image may not be a trivial task. If all the content of the section is being removed (e. If necessary (where there is an image, but only a short paragraph of text) add . Use the edit summary .
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |